http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/ RecentChanges for tsvbr http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/feedlogo.gif http://pbwiki.com/ PBwiki 1.3.9 support@pbwiki.com http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/MOML email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited MOML]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:36:45 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/MOML email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited MOML Additional Comments
[arj 6/27/2008] The Vendor Records Task Force has communicated with Gale several times during 2008 regarding the MOML records. We are very pleased that they have corrected the OCLC number problem and that they have agreed to send the MOML records to an authority vendor for cleanup. We hope to continue working with Gale on this.
[arj 9/3/2008] Added additional comments in the Variable Lengths Field section.
[arj 10/28/2008] Additional comments regarding series statement added to Variable Lengths Field section.
]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:36:03 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/MOML email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited MOML The records have been reviewed by members of the task group.
Authority Control
heading "[Jurisdiciton] "[Jurisdiction] -- Constitutional law" (occurs304times)and "[Jurisdiction] -- Constitutional history" (occurs 229 times). Both headings were correct at one time but are now obsolete.
The Vendor Records Task Group has communicated with Cengage on this and other issues and has encouraged Cengage to send the records to an authority control vendor for authority cleanup. As of June 10, 2008, we have not had a response to our request.
UPDATE (6/26/2008): The Task Group has heard from Gale, and Gale has agreed to send the MOML records to an authority control vendor. The Task Group will be working with Gale on an authority profile, so that the records can be processed with as much accuracy as possible. More updates will be posted as they are received.
when yo9u order the orderingthe records from Gale,make sure to ask for the revise]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:02:12 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/MOML email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited MOML The Vendor Records Task Group has communicated with Cengage on this and other issues and has encouraged Cengage to send the records to an authority control vendor for authority cleanup. As of June 10, 2008, we have not had a response to our request.
UPDATE (6/26/2008): The Task Group has heard from Gale, and Gale has agreed to send the MOML records to an authority control vendor. The Task Group will be working with Gale on an authority profile, so that the records can be processed with as much accuracy as possible. More updates will be posted as they are received.
control work. The revised file of MOML work, so when yo9u order the records is from Gale,make sure to ask for the revised file.That fileis now also in thehands of OCLC, who will load it into WorldCat, probably in December.
Fixed Fields
The coding of the 006 field for computer file has one incorrect value.Type of file is coded asj (online system or service). It should be coded asd (d]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:00:11 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/Batchload+Analysis email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited Batchload Analysis]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:50:53 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/Batchload+Analysis email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited Batchload Analysis]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:50:36 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/Batchload+Analysis email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited Batchload Analysis]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:49:42 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/Batchload+Analysis email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited Batchload Analysis Task Group onVendor-Supplied Bibliographic Records
Demystifying Batchload Analysis
Presented at the 2008 AALL meeting in Portland, Oregon
Co-sponsored byOBS-SIS & TS-SIS
Sunday, July 13, 2008
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM
Oregon Convention Center,RoomE146
PowerPoint Presentation
batchload_analysis.ppt
]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:46:36 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/Batchload+Analysis email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited Batchload Analysis 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM
Oregon Convention Center,RoomE146
Program HandoutPowerPoint Presentation
batchload_analysis.ppt
Program Handout in PDF
batchload_analysis.pdf
]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:42:29 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/FrontPage email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited FrontPage Cataloging and Classification Standing Committee
Task Group onVendor-Supplied Bibliographic Records
Demystifying Batchload Analysis Program: Information & Handout
DISCLAIMER: This is a project in progress and does not represent any official position of the American Association of Law Libraries.
]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:40:14 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/f/batchload_analysis.ppt email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym uploaded batchload_analysis.ppt]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:39:51 +0000 upl http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/SideBar email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited SideBar]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:38:27 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/SideBar email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited SideBar FAQ
General Discussion
Demystifying Batchload Analysis
Record Sets
BNA
]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:36:43 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/MOML email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited MOML The Vendor Records Task Group has communicated with Cengage on this and other issues and has encouraged Cengage to send the records to an authority control vendor for authority cleanup. As of June 10, 2008, we have not had a response to our request.
UPDATE (6/26/2008): The Task Group has heard from Gale, and Gale has agreed to send the MOML records to an authority control vendor. The Task Group will be working with Gale on an authority profile, so that the records can be processed with as much accuracy as possible. More updates will be posted as they are received.
UPDATE (11/24/08):Gale sent the MOML records to LTI for authority control work. The revised file of MOML records is now in thehands of OCLC, who will load it into WorldCat, probably in December.
Fixed Fields
The coding of the 006 field for computer file has one incorrect value.Type of file is coded asj (online system or service). It should be coded asd (document).
]]> Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:27:17 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/HeinOnine+World+Trials email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited HeinOnine World Trials]]> Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:55:56 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/HeinOnine+World+Trials email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited HeinOnine World Trials]]> Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:54:52 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/HeinOnine+World+Trials email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited HeinOnine World Trials All values seem to be correct.
260 field: the information in thisfield is that of the digitizer, with the information about the priint in a 500 note. Example:
260 [Buffalo, [Buffalo, NY] :|bWilliam S. Hein & & Co.,|c[2008]
500 Print Print version published: New York : Dewitt & & Davenport, [1852?]
Comment: This approach is not incorrect but is a departure from the more common practice of including the name of the original print publisher and original date of publication in the 260 field, with information about the electronic reproduction in the 533 field.Cassidy's approach may make it more difficult for us in the future to matchall the duplicate e-monographs and merge them into single provider-neutral records.ym
553 records contained 010 fields for the print version. The LCCN was coded in a subfield z. The 776 field was not used. This was reported to Cassidy. They are investiga]]> Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:53:14 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/HeinOnine+World+Trials email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited HeinOnine World Trials]]> Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:50:52 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/HeinOnine+World+Trials email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited HeinOnine World Trials]]> Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:50:18 +0000 mod http://tsvbr.pbwiki.com/HeinOnine+World+Trials email.hidden@example.com (ym) ym edited HeinOnine World Trials 007 is coded as follows for all records: 007 crbnnnnauauu
All values seem to be correct.
260 field: the information in thisfield is that of the digitizer, with the information about the priint in a 500 note. Example:
260 [Buffalo, NY] :|bWilliam S. Hein & Co.,|c[2008]
500 Print version published: New York : Dewitt & Davenport, [1852?]
Comment: This approach is not incorrect but is a departure from the more common practice of including the name of the original print publisher and original date of publication in the 260 field, with information about the electronic reproduction in the 533 field.Cassidy's approach may make it more difficult for us in the future to matchall the duplicate e-monographs and merge them into single provider-neutral records.ym
553 records contained 010 fields for the print version. The LCCN was coded in a subfield z. The 776 field was not used. This was reported to Cassidy. They are investigating.
Some "print version" note]]> Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:47:00 +0000 mod